主页 > 医学新闻 >
【medical-news】双路微超乳优于同轴微超乳？
Disadvantages can include longer phaco time, leakage from incision, however
Feb 1, 2007
By: Lynda Charters
Dr. Franchini
Investigators are eagerly comparing ways to perform phacoemulsification to obtain the best results for patients. Bimanual microincision phaco has been receiving a great deal of attention and is being compared with ultra-small-incision coaxial phaco and with conventional phaco.
Comparing
"At the beginning of this century, the introduction of ultra-small technology allowed the microincisional cataract surgery to be performed," said Alessandro Franchini, MD, assistant director, University of Florence Eye Institute, Florence, Italy. "Over the past year, the introduction of the microsleeve allowed surgeons the possibility to perform coaxial phacoemulsification through a small incision.
"Today," he said, "microincisional cataract surgery is no longer synonymous with bimanual procedures."
Now that surgeons are investigating the possibility of performing the surgery with coaxial phaco through a small incision, the bimanual procedure no longer may be needed, he noted.
Dr. Franchini and his colleagues sought to determine whether bimanual microincisional cataract surgery still should be performed even if surgeons can perform coaxial phaco through a microincision.
"The first point concerns the fluidics," he said. "During coaxial phacoemulsification, a portion of the irrigation fluid is captured by irrigation 本人已认领此文。48小时内翻译。 Bimanual microincision phaco has advantages in safety, efficiency versus ultra-small coaxial phaco
Disadvantages can include longer phaco time, leakage from incision, however
双路微超乳在安全性及时效性上优于同轴微超乳，然而，其缺点是较长的切割时间及切口渗漏。 双路微超乳在安全性及时效性上优于同轴微超乳，然而，其缺点是较长的切割时间及切口渗漏。 好长啊! [标签:content1][标签:content2]
阅读本文的人还阅读：
作者:admin@医学,生命科学 2011-07-14 00:40
医学,生命科学网