主页 > 医学信息 >

【商业翻译—医师报约稿】15. From Clinical Cancer

1.翻译并非简单直译,最新格式规范要求及示例请看:
商业翻译的战友务必请看一下本帖
2.7.15(周日)10:00前交稿。
3. 稿酬按医师报标准。
4. 为保证翻译质量起见,在本版得分超过15分以上的战友方可认领。每位战友最多认领2篇。
5. 作者统一署名为"丁香"。
6. 文中出现的杂志名称用原文,无需翻译。
7. 字数平均是300-500字,最多通常不超过700字。战友根据各篇文章自行把握。
8. 为了保证质量,请认领者选择至少一位其他认领者做互相对译。编译稿完成时,一并说明与哪位战友合作完成。此外,欢迎其他战友(非认领者)多多参与。

Source: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Released: Mon 02-Jul-2007, 14:00 ET
Embargo expired: Tue 03-Jul-2007, 00:00 ET
Printer-friendly Version

From Clinical Cancer Research: Rethinking Therapeutic Cancer Vaccine Trials

Newswise — Ongoing therapeutic cancer vaccine trials have yet to show evidence of vaccines spurring a patient’s immune system to shrink tumors -- yet patients who receive these vaccines in trials tend to live longer and respond better to subsequent treatment. In the July 1 issue of Clinical Cancer Research, a journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, a team of National Cancer Institute researchers asks a fundamental question: are we looking at cancer vaccine trials the wrong way?

“Cancer Vaccines: Moving Beyond Current Paradigms,” Jeffrey Schlom, et. al., Clinical Cancer Research, July 1, 2007, Volume 13, No. 13, pages 3776-3782.

In a review of five prostate cancer vaccine trials, NCI researchers offer evidence that patients who receive vaccines may respond better to subsequent chemotherapy or hormone treatment. The specific results – or endpoints – of these clinical trials, however, were not the long term survival of patients, but rather the degree to which the vaccine caused tumors to shrink. According to the researchers, since they didn’t achieve their primary endpoints, these vaccines may be abandoned as dead-ends, despite their real therapeutic value in terms of prolonging patient survival.

“Clinical data are providing evidence that patients are living longer following vaccination, de-spite the fact that trials do not show the vaccines can induce the immune system into shrinking tumors,” said Jeffrey Schlom, Ph.D., chief of the Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Biology at the National Cancer Institute. “The data suggests that the scientific community and regulatory committees ought to rethink the design of clinical vaccine trials and our current approach to measuring the effectiveness of a cancer vaccine.”

According to the researchers, it may be more helpful to think of the effectiveness of a vaccine in terms of the response of the patient, rather than the response of the tumor. While the Response Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) experimental standards works well in evaluating therapies that are toxic to tumors, such as radiation or chemotherapy, they are less capable of measuring the more subtle systemic effects of immune response, Schlom said.

While there is no conclusive evidence to explain why a vaccine may lead to better patient sur-vival, Schlom believes the evidence suggests that vaccines are, in fact, priming the immune sys-tem. “Vaccines are not passive, they induce a dynamic process of immune response that, in many cases may keep the tumor in check and enhance the effectiveness of subsequent therapies,” Schlom said.

About Therapeutic Cancer Vaccines

Unlike preventative vaccines, like those that protect against human papillomavirus or the flu, therapeutic cancer vaccines are given in the hopes of treating an existing disease. These cancer vaccines generally fall into two categories: cell-based, where vaccines are created using cells from the patient’s own immune system that have been activated to the presence of cancer antigens and delivered back to the patient along with additional proteins that facilitate immune activation; and vector-based, where an engineered virus, or vector, is used to introduce cancer proteins and other molecules to stimulate the immune system. Both approaches are designed to rile the patient’s immune system into attacking tumor cells.
In their review Schlom and his colleagues looked at two cell-based vaccines, Sipuleucel-T (Provenge) and GVAX, as well as three trials using an engineered pox-virus vector. While this review article focuses on prostate cancer vaccines, the researchers consider these trials as exam-ples of ongoing progress in similar vaccine therapies for lymphoma, melanoma, pancreatic, lung and other types of cancer. 本人认领此文。如在48小时内未能提交译文,其他战友自由认领。 Source: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)

阅读本文的人还阅读:

【Nat Rev Cancer】2011年2月

【drug-news】Breast Cancer

【Cancer research】短暂进入

作者:admin@医学,生命科学    2011-03-06 17:13
医学,生命科学网