主页 > 医学讨论 >

【文摘发布】心肌梗死后无症状性心肌缺血应用

Title:Effects of Percutaneous Coronary Interventions in Silent Ischemia After Myocardial Infarction:The SWISSI II Randomized Controlled Trial
Author:Paul Erne, MD; Andreas W. Schoenenberger, MD; Dieter Burckhardt, MD;et al
Resource:JAMA. 2007;297:1985-1991.
Abstract:Context :The effect of a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) on the long-term prognosis of patients with silent ischemia after a myocardial infarction (MI) is not known.
Objective : To determine whether PCI compared with drug therapy improves long-term outcome of asymptomatic patients with silent ischemia after an MI.
Design, Setting, and Participants: Randomized, unblinded, controlled trial (Swiss Interventional Study on Silent Ischemia Type II [SWISSI II]) conducted from May 2, 1991, to February 25, 1997, at 3 public hospitals in Switzerland of 201 patients with a recent MI, silent myocardial ischemia verified by stress imaging, and 1- or 2-vessel coronary artery disease. Follow-up ended on May 23, 2006.
Interventions: Percutaneous coronary intervention aimed at full revascularization (n = 96) or intensive anti-ischemic drug therapy (n = 105). All patients received 100 mg/d of aspirin and a statin.
Main Outcome Measures : Survival free of major adverse cardiac events defined as cardiac death, nonfatal MI, and/or symptom-driven revascularization. Secondary measures included exercise-induced ischemia and resting left ventricular ejection fraction during follow-up.
Results : During a mean (SD) follow-up of 10.2 (2.6) years, 27 major adverse cardiac events occurred in the PCI group and 67 events occurred in the anti-ischemic drug therapy group (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.33; 95% confidence interval, 0.20-0.55; P<.001), which corresponds to an absolute event reduction of 6.3% per year (95% confidence interval, 3.7%-8.9%; P<.001). Patients in the PCI group had lower rates of ischemia (11.6% vs 28.9% in patients in the drug therapy group at final follow-up; P = .03) despite fewer drugs. Left ventricular ejection fraction remained preserved in PCI patients (mean [SD] of 53.9% [9.9%] at baseline to 55.6% [8.1%] at final follow-up) and decreased significantly (P<.001) in drug therapy patients (mean [SD] of 59.7% [11.8%] at baseline to 48.8% [7.9%] at final follow-up).
Conclusion: Among patients with recent MI, silent myocardial ischemia verified by stress imaging, and 1- or 2-vessel coronary artery disease, PCI compared with anti-ischemic drug therapy reduced the long-term risk of major cardiac events.
Trial Registration clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00387231 本人已认领该文编译,48小时后若未提交译文,请其他战友自由认领。 Title:Effects of Percutaneous Coronary Interventions in Silent Ischemia After Myocardial Infarction:The SWISSI II Randomized Controlled Trial
题目:心肌梗死后无症状性心肌缺血应用经皮冠状动脉介入有益 罗战友总体译的相当好,提几点小问题:
1.目的中“提高...预后”改为“改善...预后”是否更好;
2.Main Outcome Measures 译为:主要测量指标;
3.cardiac death译为:心源性死亡;
4.Secondary measures译为:次要测量指标;
5.mean (SD) follow-up of 10.2 (2.6) years译为:在平均10.2±2.6年的随访期内;mean 为平均的意思,中位应为median,如果用中位数表示的话就不会出现SD了;后同;
6.“调整后HR=0.33”改为“校正后的HR”;
7.“减低了长期主要心脏意外的危险”改为“降低了长期主要心脏事件的风险”。 [标签:content1][标签:content2]

阅读本文的人还阅读:

【bio-news】miRNA-499具有心

缺血性中风急性期用斯他

心肌梗塞后的贫血病人输

综述-海绵窦及其周围结

【NEJM】《New Eng J med》发

作者:admin@医学,生命科学    2011-02-27 17:12
医学,生命科学网