主页 > 医学讨论 >
【medical-news】多排螺旋CT准确检测阑尾穿孔
NEW YORK (Reuters Health) Jan 03 - Multidetector row helical CT allows an accurate diagnosis of appendiceal perforation by imaging a defect in the contrast-enhanced appendiceal wall, according to a report in the January 2008 issue of Radiology.
Recent studies have shown single-section helical CT to be useful in differentiating perforated from nonperforated appendicitis, the authors explain, but the accuracy was not high for any single finding.
Dr. Masahiro Tsuboi from Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Miyagi, Japan and associates retrospectively evaluated the accuracy of multidetector row CT with intravenous contrast material and without oral contrast material for the depiction of perforated appendicitis.
All but 2 of 40 patients with perforated appendicitis had a clearly visualized focal defect in appendiceal wall enhancement, the researchers report, and only 2 of 62 patients with nonperforated appendicitis had false-positive findings for a focal appendiceal wall defect.
The finding of a focal defect was, therefore, 95% sensitive, 96.8% specific, and 96.1% accurate in diagnosing perforation.
By way of comparison, detection of abscess, extraluminal air, and extraluminal appendicolith was 37.5% sensitive, 22.5% specific, and 32.5% accurate in diagnosing perforation, while identification of phlegmon was 40.0% sensitive, 95.2% specific, and 73.5% accurate in diagnosing appendiceal perforation.
"Multidetector row CT with intravenous contrast material and without oral contrast material could accurately help differentiate perforated appendicitis from nonperforated appendicitis," the researchers conclude.
Radiology 2008;246:142-147.
http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/568225 本人已认领该文编译，48小时后若未提交译文，请其他战友自由认领。 NEW YORK (Reuters Health) Jan 03 - Multidetector row helical CT allows an accurate diagnosis of appendiceal perforation by imaging a defect in the contrast-enhanced appendiceal wall, according to a report in the January 2008 issue of Radiology.
纽约（路透通讯社健康版）1月3日讯 来自2008年1月出版的《放射学》的报道 多排螺旋CT通过对比增强模拟阑尾壁的缺损，可以准确诊断阑尾穿孔。
Recent studies have shown single-section helical CT to be useful in differentiating perforated from nonperforated appendicitis, the authors explain, but the accuracy was not high for any single finding.
作者指出：近期的研究显示，单节螺旋CT可以对阑尾穿孔的诊断有一定作用，但其准确性一直不尽如人意。
Dr. Masahiro Tsuboi from Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Miyagi, Japan and associates retrospectively evaluated the accuracy of multidetector row CT with intravenous contrast material and without oral contrast material for the depiction of perforated appendicitis.
来自日本东北大学医学研究生院的Masahiro博士及其同事通过回顾性研究，评价静脉造影和无口服造影多排螺旋CT对阑尾穿孔的描述诊断。
All but 2 of 40 patients with perforated appendicitis had a clearly visualized focal defect in appendiceal wall enhancement, the researchers report, and only 2 of 62 patients with nonperforated appendicitis had false-positive findings for a focal appendiceal wall defect.
四十名阑尾穿孔患者中有两名其阑尾壁的局灶缺损可以被清晰增强显示，六十二名非阑尾穿孔患者中仅两名出现阑尾壁局灶缺损的假阳性发现。
The finding of a focal defect was, therefore, 95% sensitive, 96.8% specific, and 96.1% accurate in diagnosing perforation.
检查发现局灶缺损的敏感性是95%，特异性是96.8%。阑尾穿孔的诊断准确率是96.1%。
By way of comparison, detection of abscess, extraluminal air, and extraluminal appendicolith was 37.5% sensitive, 22.5% specific, and 32.5% accurate in diagnosing perforation, while identification of phlegmon was 40.0% sensitive, 95.2% specific, and 73.5% accurate in diagnosing appendiceal perforation.
通过对比，诊断阑尾穿孔时，脓肿、外漏气体、阑尾结石的诊断敏感性是37.5%，特异性是22.5%，准确性32.5%，然而诊断阑尾穿孔时阑尾蜂窝织炎的诊断敏感性是40%，特异性是95.2%，准确性73.5%
"Multidetector row CT with intravenous contrast material and without oral contrast material could accurately help differentiate perforated appendicitis from nonperforated appendicitis," the researchers conclude.
研究者总结指出：静脉造影和无口服造影螺旋CT能精确的利于阑尾穿孔的诊断。
纽约（路透通讯社健康版）1月3日讯 来自2008年1月出版的《放射学》的报道 多排螺旋CT通过对比增强模拟阑尾壁的缺损，可以准确诊断阑尾穿孔。
作者指出：近期的研究显示，单节螺旋CT可以对阑尾穿孔的诊断有一定作用，但其准确性一直不尽如人意
阅读本文的人还阅读：
作者:admin@医学,生命科学 2010-12-13 17:11
医学,生命科学网